Racism in reverse is still racism

What if African Americans did have more of a predisposition to turn violent considering the post traumatic stress African americans had gone throughout American history used and abused as slaves and then suffering racism?Would that constitute racist?

Why would a testimony of a psychologist that generalised all African americans without the support of research facts done on that topic be enough to allow the man to be free within 17 years?

The man broke into an apartment and murdered two people and tried to kill a family member, why would the court of law consider his welfare and not that of society ‘s right for defense from a dangerous man?

While it is true that America has a history of convicting and jailing African americans falsely and also increasing sentences compared to nonAfrican americans, it is till not logic to use racism to excuse the possible exposure of society  to a convicted murderer who had admitted his crime . 

What makes society and the law system so forgiving towards violent deadly crimes and not consider the possible threat to other nonviolent members of society is beyond any logic i can come up with. 

 

 

Texas Man’s Death Sentence Thrown Out Over Racist Testimony

Duane E. Buck barged into his girlfriend’s Texas home after she broke up with him and killed her and a friend. Later that morning in July 1995, he fired a rifle at his stepsister, who survived because the bullet just missed her heart.

His guilt was never in doubt, and Mr. Buck, 54, who is black, was sentenced to death by lethal injection. But concerns about testimony from a psychologist in the sentencing phase — that black people were more dangerous than white people — raised concerns about the role of race in the jury’s decision and led the case to reach the Supreme Court.

In February, the Supreme Court ordered a new sentencing trial for Mr. Buck, calling the psychologist’s testimony racist. In a Houston courtroom on Tuesday, Mr. Buck pleaded guilty to two counts of attempted murder, including the shooting of his stepsister, in a deal that exchanged the death penalty for a life sentence plus two 60-year terms.

“This case can accomplish something,” said Kim Ogg, the Harris County district attorney. “It can close a chapter in the history of our courts, in that they will never again hear that race is relevant to criminal justice or to the determination of whether a man will live or die. Race is not and never has been evidence.”

Continue reading the main story
RELATED COVERAGE

 

Citing Racist Testimony, Justices Call for New Sentencing in Texas Death Penalty Case FEB. 22, 2017

Texas Death Row Inmate’s Bid for Resentencing Has Support of Victim, Prosecutor and Ex-Governor MARCH 28, 2013
ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main story

After Mr. Buck’s conviction in 1997, his lawyer called Walter Quijano, a former chief psychologist for the state prison system, to the stand during the sentencing phase. Mr. Quijano, who had evaluated Mr. Buck, testified that race could be a factor in predicting whether a person posed a future danger to society.

Newsletter Sign UpContinue reading the main story
Get the Morning Briefing by Email
What you need to know to start your day, delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday.

Sign Up

You agree to receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times’s products and services.

SEE SAMPLE MANAGE EMAIL PREFERENCES PRIVACY POLICY OPT OUT OR CONTACT US ANYTIME
A prosecutor asked Mr. Quijano, “The race factor, black, increases the future dangerousness for various complicated reasons — is that correct?”

“Yes,” the psychologist replied.

The psychologist’s answers became the basis of an appeal claiming that Mr. Buck had not been properly represented by his lawyer.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for the Supreme Court’s majority in a 6-to-2 ruling, said Mr. Quijano’s testimony “appealed to a powerful racial stereotype — that of black men as ‘violence prone.’”

Mr. Buck will be moved from death row in Texas, where more than 230 inmates await lethal injection, and he will be eligible for parole in 2035. Ms. Ogg said her office would work to ensure he is never granted release.

Over the years, Mr. Buck had an unusual advocate in his stepsister, Phyllis Taylor, who had forgiven him and had argued for his release from death row. Ms. Taylor said in a statement on Tuesday she was thankful that Ms. Ogg had reached a deal to avoid another sentencing trial.

“The thought of going through another trial was just too much to bear,” Ms. Taylor said.

About seagullsea

a seagull flying over the great ocean of life observing.
This entry was posted in racism as a reality, racism in USA, Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s